|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 20, 2015 19:20:08 GMT -6
That appears to be about the ending of 1610 but not 616. I honestly wouldn't mind if they cancelled both actually, if only for them to start fresh and do the hard reboot DC were to afaid to do. It's talking about both. They even tweeted about the end of the Marvel and Ultimate Marvel universe. Also, it doesn't seem like a hard reboot. They talk about both smashing into each other and sorta merging with elements from various universes being there.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 21, 2015 11:49:14 GMT -6
I'm pretty sure it's just more BS media to promote another relaunch. I seriously doubt they'll end the MU, although I hope they do. Because despite Marvel's decision to focus more on 616, it's as familiar and as stagnant as it's ever been. They're always saying they're going to change things up, but they never do. They keep saying something will change forever, but it never does. They say someone's dead, but they aren't. They say what it means to be a hero, even though you hardly see anyone saving the public anymore. They talk about a hero's sacrifice, when there is no sacrifice. They speak of devastating threats which in fact never even succeeds in accomplishing anything, and we're supposed to try and work out what's so threatening about them. They have characters turning bad and good all the time like they have schizophrenia and the scientist characters refuse to look at issues scientifically. It's just broken promises month after month.
These problems taint all the really, really good stuff too. Bringing in characters like Silk and Miles Morales is cool and interesting, but what about all the other heroes that are never used? Can't we just send all of them to fight battles sometimes and give the Avengers and X-Men a night off? I'm surprised the Earth hasn't become a huge superpowered warzone. I like these comics. I just wish they weren't so trivial all the time.
Marvel are not confident in changing anything at the moment. Modern Marvel character development is always very temporary, disallowing the creators to really push forward with a character so we can really enjoy seeing them change and develop over the course of many years. You take any other series as an example, a TV series or an Indy comic book series, and the characters from the series debut are always completely different by the time we get to the big finale. And that never fails to amaze and surprise audiences/readers. Sometimes, the characters have changed so much and have done so many questionable things that they can't ever go back, and that's fun and engaging, and makes our commitment all the more worth while.. but the Marvel executives don't want that. Fans like to follow characters develop and we like seeing them slowly be shaped by their environment.. but with Marvel characters this is oddly never the case. And even though they have such an abundance of characters, they're too afraid to kill anyone off. Why can't anyone die? It makes all these battles and wars seem pointless and completely unnecessary. The Marvel executives need to be more bold and MAKE us care about what changes are afoot.
If they can engage fans through manipulating and lying to them through the media, I'm sure they'd be even more successful if they actually did what they said they're going to do.
If I could sum it all up into one sentence I'd say: Indy comics are infinitely superior.
I wish fans would speak with their wallets more so their keyboards. It's embarrassing how easily conned comic book readers are. The MU isn't ending. We've got to get through at least another five more years of the executives saying it might be happening, before it actually happens.
This reboot is probably just bringing in fan-favourite characters from other universes to make their new MU relaunch feel more significant. These MU relaunch's are practically annual events now. They'll probably do something a little more confident next year.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 21, 2015 13:16:15 GMT -6
So I finally got caught up on Spider-Verse. Well, at least most of it. I still haven't read the last issue of the team-up series, Spider-Woman's tie-ins, or Spider-Man 2099's.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 23, 2015 13:12:09 GMT -6
So I finally got caught up on Spider-Verse. Well, at least most of it. I still haven't read the last issue of the team-up series, Spider-Woman's tie-ins, or Spider-Man 2099's. I haven't read all of it yet either. I stopped following Spider-Verse a little while back because I was struggling with the chronological order. What I read was really good though. 2099, Spider-Gwen and MC2 stuff, I love it. I just wish I wasn't missing so much of it. I feel like I have most of the main stuff but I'm missing a lot of the tie-ins which is really annoying because I want the whole story. There's a HC coming out in May so I'm probably going to wait for that instead but I'm not even sure if the first six issues of the run are included in the HC.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 23, 2015 17:27:32 GMT -6
So I finally got caught up on Spider-Verse. Well, at least most of it. I still haven't read the last issue of the team-up series, Spider-Woman's tie-ins, or Spider-Man 2099's. I haven't read all of it yet either. I stopped following Spider-Verse a little while back because I was struggling with the chronological order. What I read was really good though. 2099, Spider-Gwen and MC2 stuff, I love it. I just wish I wasn't missing so much of it. I feel like I have most of the main stuff but I'm missing a lot of the tie-ins which is really annoying because I want the whole story. There's a HC coming out in May so I'm probably going to wait for that instead but I'm not even sure if the first six issues of the run are included in the HC. I was reading on Comixology and at the end of an issue, it'd let you know what was next. Plus there's a checklist in the back of each issue, I believe. I'm really excited for comics this year, I'm hopefully getting back in the swing (pun intended) of things. My monthly list is Amazing Spider-Man, Gotham Academy, Spider-Gwen, and Silk. I'd have added 2099 there, but I should trade wait that. Same with Ms. Marvel, Batgirl, Wayward, and maybe Teen Titans. I might have to adjust this list when that new Archie comic comes out, though. Oh and of course Secret Wars.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Jan 24, 2015 3:03:18 GMT -6
I've been following Spider-verse on comixology also. The checklist in the back is a guide but not perfect. For example if you read Scarlet Spiders before ASM this last week then it would make more sense, but on the checklist ASM is listed before it. I'm definitely not a Spidey guy normally but this has been a good little event.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Jan 24, 2015 3:08:44 GMT -6
I'm pretty sure it's just more BS media to promote another relaunch. I seriously doubt they'll end the MU, although I hope they do. Because despite Marvel's decision to focus more on 616, it's as familiar and as stagnant as it's ever been. They're always saying they're going to change things up, but they never do. They keep saying something will change forever, but it never does. They say someone's dead, but they aren't. They say what it means to be a hero, even though you hardly see anyone saving the public anymore. They talk about a hero's sacrifice, when there is no sacrifice. They speak of devastating threats which in fact never even succeeds in accomplishing anything, and we're supposed to try and work out what's so threatening about them. They have characters turning bad and good all the time like they have schizophrenia and the scientist characters refuse to look at issues scientifically. It's just broken promises month after month. These problems taint all the really, really good stuff too. Bringing in characters like Silk and Miles Morales is cool and interesting, but what about all the other heroes that are never used? Can't we just send all of them to fight battles sometimes and give the Avengers and X-Men a night off? I'm surprised the Earth hasn't become a huge superpowered warzone. I like these comics. I just wish they weren't so trivial all the time. Marvel are not confident in changing anything at the moment. Modern Marvel character development is always very temporary, disallowing the creators to really push forward with a character so we can really enjoy seeing them change and develop over the course of many years. You take any other series as an example, a TV series or an Indy comic book series, and the characters from the series debut are always completely different by the time we get to the big finale. And that never fails to amaze and surprise audiences/readers. Sometimes, the characters have changed so much and have done so many questionable things that they can't ever go back, and that's fun and engaging, and makes our commitment all the more worth while.. but the Marvel executives don't want that. Fans like to follow characters develop and we like seeing them slowly be shaped by their environment.. but with Marvel characters this is oddly never the case. And even though they have such an abundance of characters, they're too afraid to kill anyone off. Why can't anyone die? It makes all these battles and wars seem pointless and completely unnecessary. The Marvel executives need to be more bold and MAKE us care about what changes are afoot. If they can engage fans through manipulating and lying to them through the media, I'm sure they'd be even more successful if they actually did what they said they're going to do. If I could sum it all up into one sentence I'd say: Indy comics are infinitely superior. I wish fans would speak with their wallets more so their keyboards. It's embarrassing how easily conned comic book readers are. The MU isn't ending. We've got to get through at least another five more years of the executives saying it might be happening, before it actually happens. This reboot is probably just bringing in fan-favourite characters from other universes to make their new MU relaunch feel more significant. These MU relaunch's are practically annual events now. They'll probably do something a little more confident next year. Did you read Death of Wolverine? It had a lot of the stuff in it that you say is missing from most Marvel comics. You are right, it is missing from most of the comics but I thought that DoW was done pretty well. Hero saves innocents, check. Hero makes ultimate sacrifice, check. Villain is doing devastating things, check. Granted I think we all know he will be back some day but it was a pretty awesome end to that chapter of his character.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 24, 2015 8:15:17 GMT -6
Did you read Death of Wolverine? It had a lot of the stuff in it that you say is missing from most Marvel comics. You are right, it is missing from most of the comics but I thought that DoW was done pretty well. Hero saves innocents, check. Hero makes ultimate sacrifice, check. Villain is doing devastating things, check. Granted I think we all know he will be back some day but it was a pretty awesome end to that chapter of his character. I didn't read it. I'm glad you enjoyed it. And I'm glad he saved innocents. I would like to see more of that from the heroes because even though it's cool to see good characters do bad things and even though moral ambiguity is awesome and one of, if not the most exciting thing about character development in my opinion, I think Marvel really need to make more distinguishing traits for the heroes by having them save lives and achieve moral accomplishments, because otherwise, I don't see the point in calling the "heroes" the heroes if they're not being heroes. It's really good that Wolverine was portrayed as a full-on hero before his death. It's not often you see that nowadays. But there wasn't any sacrifice. He's just taking a break. All it is, is a reprieve or an afterlife vacation. I know that's probably not how it was told, but that's clearly how it is. If Wolverine died to save a few innocents, that's great, but it's no different than if you were to sacrifice yourself to save your family only for you to be resurrected shortly after, that wouldn't be a sacrifice because you'd just be making the decision for all of you to be alive, even if you have to stay asleep underground or whatever for a couple years. It's a no-brainer. If you were to do that and then come back to life, there'd be no sacrifice. If anything, Wolverine has gained a break from all the fighting. That's not what a sacrifice is. If he stays dead, that's a sacrifice. But if he's resurrected, that sacrifice is cancelled out. I've heard a lot of people say he made the ultimate sacrifice when in actual fact he gained a rest. But my main gripe is from the other characters. Why are they upset about Wolverine dying? Surely, SURELY, they must know by now that he'll be back in a couple months (MC time). Surely they must understand that by now? That's how it works. The heroes can't be killed off, and if they are it's only temporary. Characters can't even kill themselves without being resurrected afterwards. In fact, surprisingly, the only thing they need to worry about is cancer. It's not like the villains are any threat to them either. They needn't care about what the villains are trying to achieve, because the villains never achieve anything.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Jan 25, 2015 2:33:26 GMT -6
Did you read Death of Wolverine? It had a lot of the stuff in it that you say is missing from most Marvel comics. You are right, it is missing from most of the comics but I thought that DoW was done pretty well. Hero saves innocents, check. Hero makes ultimate sacrifice, check. Villain is doing devastating things, check. Granted I think we all know he will be back some day but it was a pretty awesome end to that chapter of his character. I didn't read it. I'm glad you enjoyed it. And I'm glad he saved innocents. I would like to see more of that from the heroes because even though it's cool to see good characters do bad things and even though moral ambiguity is awesome and one of, if not the most exciting thing about character development in my opinion, I think Marvel really need to make more distinguishing traits for the heroes by having them save lives and achieve moral accomplishments, because otherwise, I don't see the point in calling the "heroes" the heroes if they're not being heroes. It's really good that Wolverine was portrayed as a full-on hero before his death. It's not often you see that nowadays. But there wasn't any sacrifice. He's just taking a break. All it is, is a reprieve or an afterlife vacation. I know that's probably not how it was told, but that's clearly how it is. If Wolverine died to save a few innocents, that's great, but it's no different than if you were to sacrifice yourself to save your family only for you to be resurrected shortly after, that wouldn't be a sacrifice because you'd just be making the decision for all of you to be alive, even if you have to stay asleep underground or whatever for a couple years. It's a no-brainer. If you were to do that and then come back to life, there'd be no sacrifice. If anything, Wolverine has gained a break from all the fighting. That's not what a sacrifice is. If he stays dead, that's a sacrifice. But if he's resurrected, that sacrifice is cancelled out. I've heard a lot of people say he made the ultimate sacrifice when in actual fact he gained a rest. But my main gripe is from the other characters. Why are they upset about Wolverine dying? Surely, SURELY, they must know by now that he'll be back in a couple months (MC time). Surely they must understand that by now? That's how it works. The heroes can't be killed off, and if they are it's only temporary. Characters can't even kill themselves without being resurrected afterwards. In fact, surprisingly, the only thing they need to worry about is cancer. It's not like the villains are any threat to them either. They needn't care about what the villains are trying to achieve, because the villains never achieve anything. I understand what you mean, but I think that is something that you have to accept when you read serialized comics especially from the big 2. Marvel and DC make so much money off of these characters that it wouldn't make sense financially to keep them off the table forever. As for other characters dealing with it I think it would be a disservice if they just laughed it off and said oh he'll be back.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 25, 2015 11:08:16 GMT -6
I understand what you mean, but I think that is something that you have to accept when you read serialized comics especially from the big 2. Marvel and DC make so much money off of these characters that it wouldn't make sense financially to keep them off the table forever. As for other characters dealing with it I think it would be a disservice if they just laughed it off and said oh he'll be back. I think one character should say something like "Logan won't stay down forever." Or "Not even Heaven will amuse Logan for that long." I think it would be great to have one or two cynical characters who observe events in pragmatic ways. I know I say this a lot but various characters should always respond differently to different things, depending on their background. I think it would be wise for Marvel to kill off at least a few of their 20,000+ characters. Mantis would be good character to kill off in an heroic way. It would also be good to kill of at least one of their cosmic powerhouse planetary defenders, try to even the score a little bit for the bad guys so that MC Earth doesn't seem like by far the most powerful planet in all of existence. Or, why not allow the chaos to tip, and plunge the entire planet (that means not just America) into a massive cosmic brawl? That would not only be amazing fun, but seems like the next logical step for the MU. They could kill off a couple villains too. Perhaps Pink Pearl could die of heart disease. There are so many great ideas waiting to happen. Marvel America, for a country that has strict immigration laws, definitely has a lot of superpowered folk running about doing whatever the hell they like. Perhaps a "Metahuman Immigration Act" could allow conflicts and superhero beat-downs to take place in more countries around the globe more often. There's an abundance of non-utilised ideas to be made if the executives want to excite fans and change things up a little bit. Many of their marketing tactics are silly and are the antithesis of creative ideas. We deserve a lot, lot more than just a mix up of a cast of a superhero team every now and then. The same goes for characters always receiving superhero afterlife holidays. It's like they're making fun of us just because we like reading comics. It' annoying. We're not children.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 25, 2015 16:57:38 GMT -6
I like to think that not many characters think about how death isn't always permanent. Honestly the only character I recall making jokes about it was Spider-Man and that fits him. To make a comparison, Christians believe that they will see their loved ones again in Heaven, but they will still cry and be upset when one of those loved ones die. So my point is that even if a popular character dies and we the audience know they will return sooner than later, the characters' friends and families are still going to be sad. As often as characters are revived in comics, it still doesn't happen so frequently that characters start noticing.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 25, 2015 17:46:47 GMT -6
I'm not saying no one should be upset about it, I'd just like to see someone be aware of the constant resurrection after such a short time of death. I expect anyone would be upset about any character dying, even if they're not particularly close. But considering how often it happens, you'd expect more characters would think something was up.
In light of this as an example, do you think Scott Summers getting with Emma Frost is a wise move considering how often his dead wife keeps coming back to life?
According to the Holy Bible (the book of Christianity) people stay dead in the ground and do not become conscious until Armageddon happens on Earth.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 25, 2015 17:48:22 GMT -6
I'm not saying no one should be upset about it, I'd just like to see someone be aware of the constsnt resurrection after such a short time of death. I expect anyone would be upset about any character dying, even if they're not particularly close. But considering how often it happens, you'd expect more characters would think something was up. In light of this as an example, do you think it's wise Scott Summers getting with Emma Frost is a wise move considering how often his dead wife keeps coming back to life? According to the Holy Bible (the book of Christianity) people stay dead in the ground and do not become conscious until Armageddon happens on Earth. Are we gonna see any young Jean/older Scott action? Haha There's some different interpretations.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 25, 2015 17:52:35 GMT -6
I'm not saying no one should be upset about it, I'd just like to see someone be aware of the constsnt resurrection after such a short time of death. I expect anyone would be upset about any character dying, even if they're not particularly close. But considering how often it happens, you'd expect more characters would think something was up. In light of this as an example, do you think it's wise Scott Summers getting with Emma Frost is a wise move considering how often his dead wife keeps coming back to life? According to the Holy Bible (the book of Christianity) people stay dead in the ground and do not become conscious until Armageddon happens on Earth. Are we gonna see any young Jean/older Scott action? Haha There's some different interpretations. One would wonder whether getting with Emma was considered cheating. Lol. It certainly wouldn't be a stretch to say Scott's waiting for Jean to come back to life again, considering how a lot of the readers are also waiting/hoping.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 25, 2015 18:10:48 GMT -6
Are we gonna see any young Jean/older Scott action? Haha There's some different interpretations. One would wonder whether getting with Emma was considered cheating. Lol. It certainly wouldn't be a stretch to say Scott's waiting for Jean to come back to life again, considering how a lot of the readers are also waiting/hoping. I suppose it'd be way too inappropriate of Marvel to travel down that road lol. Maybe if this were the Ultimate universe.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 26, 2015 15:36:33 GMT -6
One would wonder whether getting with Emma was considered cheating. Lol. It certainly wouldn't be a stretch to say Scott's waiting for Jean to come back to life again, considering how a lot of the readers are also waiting/hoping. I suppose it'd be way too inappropriate of Marvel to travel down that road lol. Maybe if this were the Ultimate universe. What I think is inappropriate is how more than 99% of the characters aren't allowed to die in peace, for good, despite the bloodthirsty agendas of even the heroes sometimes. The Avengers and the X-Men even had an all-out war with one another, except it wasn't a war at all. No one died. I don't think even toddlers and small children would perceive that as a war. In fact, more people die in a console war (Black Friday X-Box vs Playstation) than a fictional story of an actual physical war involving powerful deities threatening to kill each other! War should be absolutely intense. Deaths are practically the epitome of one. And yet despite Marvel claiming to have written superpowered war stories, they've never ever actually been confident to do one. On the thread-page before this one, I quickly went through all of Marvel's constant contradictions, false claims and broken promises in which Marvel practically operate solely on. And those problems have overtaken the entire publisher agenda. It's as though the executives are only talking about how to lie to the public to get them to buy their books. Do they think that's clever? Or are they only interested in sales? It's boggles my mind the decisions they always make. They've always been capable of telling good stories with their characters, and the universe is always positively bursting with heaps of potential and lots and lots of writers within the comic book industry have written great stories within the incredibly universe, but every single executive decision is so freaking shit (forgive my language), stagnant and counterproductive that it's darn right blasphemous to everything that is fiction. The executives completely trivialise their own stories with their decisions. Am I wrong about that? The writers are good, it's the executive decisions that taint and trivialise the stories they're trying to tell. No can die a true heroic death because the outcome will always regress. They don't push forward like they should. If Marvel are thinking of dramatically altering the line like their press coverage constantly repeats, then perhaps they should have the balls to do an actual Marvel war like they say they will. I don't see the point in doing something that's only used as a sales pitch before the concept is cancelled out via a resurrection. Character resurrections should be ALMOST impossible. The UU wasn't wise, bold or clever to do that, killing off Peter Parker and meaning it really means something and it doesn't take a genius to work out why. Beth being killed off in the mid-season 5 finale of TWD caused an emotional uproar and that's testament to how brilliant it is. It was the same for Ultimate Peter Parker in DoSM but much, much more so. It was beautiful. It made people cry. It wasn't tainted or trivialised in any way. It was powerful because Marvel meant it. They meant to kill him off for good. My favourite ever Spider-Man too!!!!! When Marvel make a decision to do something - it doesn't matter what it is - they should mean it. But yeah, Marvel say they're gona give us a war but they don't. I've seen more violent pub brawls. Marvel could learn a lot from Image. I hear Invincible could very well become it's own proper massive superhero universe someday. I still like Marvel, but they're fictional universe is now primitive by design.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 26, 2015 16:07:06 GMT -6
I think it's gonna be a war, especially with so many different realities in one place.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 27, 2015 13:31:03 GMT -6
I think it's gonna be a war, especially with so many different realities in one place. I guarantee 616 win. I don't think they've ever lost an event.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 27, 2015 15:48:47 GMT -6
I think it's gonna be a war, especially with so many different realities in one place. I guarantee 616 win. I don't think they've ever lost an event. Well I hope so lol.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 27, 2015 17:01:07 GMT -6
BIG Avengers: AoU details. www.comicbookmovie.com/avengers/news/• It's supposed to work really well as an origin story for Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch. They'll be aligned with Baron Von Zemo at the beginning of the movie. • There won't be any Magneto references as Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver are NOT mutants. How they acquire their powers however has not been revealed and probably won't be until the film's release. • Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch will side with Ultron for quite some time. Hopefully it won't feel so half-assed or as thrown-in as Hawkeye was in The Avengers. • Apparently, the two non-mutant siblings will be brought up to hate America. This will blatantly tie in to Captain America: CW. You know what Marvel's like. • Quicksilver seems set to be a very serious and "angsty" character, pissed off that the world moves too slowly, he doesn't trust anybody and is very protective of his sister. Good stuff. • Considering Liz Olen's vague response, could Scarlet Witch and Vision hook up in future Avengers instalments? It would certainly be great to see a romance bloom on the battlefield and the Avengers: Infinity two-parter would be an excellent opportunity to do that. • The full extent of her powers won't be revealed in this movie so fingers crossed Infinity Part Two won't end with her used as a marysue reset button. Especially seeing as the Infinity Gems are supposed to have infinite power. • Yes, the fallen Mjolnir and broken shield do have something to do with Thanos. Does he kill them all at the end? Whedon literally said that everyone dies at the end of the movie, and then went on to say he neither confirms or denies. It's unlikely this will happen considering the upcoming Marvel movies like Captain America: Civil War but it definitely seems like at least one or two characters will be killed off. Arron Taylor Johnson on his role as Quicksilver. I like this guy already.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 27, 2015 17:04:37 GMT -6
I guarantee 616 win. I don't think they've ever lost an event. Well I hope so lol. Plus with minimal casualties. Marvel should have some sort of voting poll. They could literally expand the market with a promo like that.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 27, 2015 22:41:36 GMT -6
Where is everyone? Just seems like Munch and I.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 29, 2015 20:08:59 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 29, 2015 22:48:26 GMT -6
I can't wait to play it. I might even do a lets play.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Jan 30, 2015 11:25:06 GMT -6
Me neither. We still haven't got an official release date yet. I wouldn't be surprised if it slipped into 2016. Silent Hills and No Man's Sky probably won't be released until 2016 either. This year I'll be getting Mortal Kombat X in April, Batman: Arhham Knight in June and Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain in September.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Jan 30, 2015 18:33:42 GMT -6
Me neither. We still haven't got an official release date yet. I wouldn't be surprised if it slipped into 2016. Silent Hills and No Man's Sky probably won't be released until 2016 either. This year I'll be getting Mortal Kombat X in April, Batman: Arhham Knight in June and Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain in September. For me I'm getting Story of Seasons, Witcher 3, Mortal Kombat X, and Until Dawn.
|
|
|
Post by Sage6Paths on Feb 1, 2015 4:41:34 GMT -6
Alright guys I'm back! Sorry. I have been job hunting but that's over. Now how about that Ultimate Reed Richards news?
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Feb 1, 2015 9:39:16 GMT -6
Alright guys I'm back! Sorry. I have been job hunting but that's over. Now how about that Ultimate Reed Richards news? How did that go? Also what news?
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Feb 1, 2015 19:03:50 GMT -6
Ewan McGregor is being pessimistic towards the new Star Wars trilogy despite his massive love for the originals. He thinks the creators have already got something wrong by providing the new Sith Lord with his uniquely designed lightsaber. www.cinemablend.com/m/new/Ewan-McGregor-Thinks-Star-Wars-Force-Awakens-Already-Got-One-Big-Thing-Wrong-69438.html?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_385712But considering how often Jedi got their lightsabers destroyed or their limbs cut off in the prequels, this new Sithly forged Crimson Lightsaber is clearly a practical design. He boasts about his wielding of the lightsaber, but all those moves can still be wielded with lightsaber hilt. What's more are the different styles of lightsaber combat. Mace Windu's Vaapad and Sidious' Juyo are more aggressive styles, whereas Obi Wan Kenobi's Soresu is more simplified but much, much more defensive. I like McGreggor but he's being a bit of an arse. Firstly, the gothic looking lightsaber is practical and has defensive advantages. And secondly, there are a wide range of different lightsaber styles that are used by Force users.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Feb 1, 2015 22:08:08 GMT -6
Ewan McGregor is being pessimistic towards the new Star Wars trilogy despite his massive love for the originals. He thinks the creators have already got something wrong by providing the new Sith Lord with his uniquely designed lightsaber. www.cinemablend.com/m/new/Ewan-McGregor-Thinks-Star-Wars-Force-Awakens-Already-Got-One-Big-Thing-Wrong-69438.html?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_385712But considering how often Jedi got their lightsabers destroyed or their limbs cut off in the prequels, this new Sithly forged Crimson Lightsaber is clearly a practical design. He boasts about his wielding of the lightsaber, but all those moves can still be wielded with lightsaber hilt. What's more are the different styles of lightsaber combat. Mace Windu's Vaapad and Sidious' Juyo are more aggressive styles, whereas Obi Wan Kenobi's Soresu is more simplified but much, much more defensive. I like McGreggor but he's being a bit of an arse. Firstly, the gothic looking lightsaber is practical and has defensive advantages. And secondly, there are a wide range of different lightsaber styles that are used by Force users. Yeah, he sounds like an ass. There's nothing really wrong with having a hilt and I think the EU had such things (although not much of that is left canon).
|
|