|
Post by wyokid on Oct 26, 2014 12:05:22 GMT -6
Wolverine12 I've been going through Wolverine and the X-Men since I don't really remember much from it. I have five episodes left but, despite having a lot of bad episodes (mainly when they go off of the main Days of Futures Past/Dark Phoenix Saga/Age of Apocalypse story) it's a pretty damn solid show and is, at least compared to the 1990's cartoon, a much more faithful and really took a lot of the comic stories (SENTINEL!) without actually adapting them. I feel like if Marvel Studios had X-Men this is what it would be. Anyway, I figured since your the X-Guy I was wondering how you felt about the series as a whole. I remember you saying you really liked it but never really went further than that. My buddy thinks Marvel has already bought Spider-Man back and Sinister Six is just in the deal. Personally I want Drake Bell. He's in the age range, he played a believable Spider-Man ripoff in Superhero Movie (not a good movie, but he was good), and he's absolutely perfect in Ultimate Spider-Man. That or Danny Glover. I don't know. I think Drake Bell has the same problem that Andrew Garfield currently has: where he's going to be too old to play Peter Parker within a span of five or six years. I think, given some great direction, Drake Bell could work out really well as Spider-Man, but, in the show, we don't really see too much Peter Parker. So, I don't really know how he'd pull that off. And voice acting is quite different from ACTING. I haven't seen the parody film so I can't really speak on that. I stand by decision but I could see Marvel maybe going for Drake Bell. Donald Glover also seems like a pretty popular choice so I wonder if they'd actually go through with that. That's why Drake Bell's age is good though. They can do what the original film did and have him graduating high school that film. Later films would have him as the adult Spider-Man. What's wrong with a Peter Parker in his thirties? Superhero Movie isn't a good place to go to see how Drake Bell can act, just that he'd pass as a superhero. Voice acting can be more difficult than acting though which is why I say give him a shot. Not Donald Glover, Danny Glover. He might be too old for this shit by now though.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 28, 2014 12:13:43 GMT -6
Wolverine12 I've been going through Wolverine and the X-Men since I don't really remember much from it. I have five episodes left but, despite having a lot of bad episodes (mainly when they go off of the main Days of Futures Past/Dark Phoenix Saga/Age of Apocalypse story) it's a pretty damn solid show and is, at least compared to the 1990's cartoon, a much more faithful and really took a lot of the comic stories (SENTINEL!) without actually adapting them. I feel like if Marvel Studios had X-Men this is what it would be. Anyway, I figured since your the X-Guy I was wondering how you felt about the series as a whole. I remember you saying you really liked it but never really went further than that. I did really enjoy the show quite a lot. I liked the animation and I actually enjoyed the DoFP story line eventually. Marrow could be really annoying but her relationship with the sentinel was kind of endearing. I thought the animation was great as well as the voice acting. They fit in a lot of classic X-Men/Wolverine tales into one season with out the series seeming to be stretched too thin which was pretty impressive. I am super bummed they never made more because from what I understand it was really popular but the first season ended around the time Disney bought Marvel so I guess they decided to go in a new overall crappy direction with their animated division.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 28, 2014 12:28:39 GMT -6
PHASE THREE!May 6th, 2016 - Captain America: Civil War July 8th, 2016 - Doctor Strange May 5th, 2017 - Untitled Guardians of the Galaxy Sequel July 28th, 2017 - Thor: Ragnarok November 3, 2017 - Black Panther May 4, 2018 - The Avengers: Infinity War Part 1 July 6th, 2018 - Captain Marvel November 2, 2018 - Inhumans May 3, 2019 - The Avengers: Infinity War Part 2 Ant-Man is the final film in phase two. Chadwick Boseman is playing Black Panther. Concept art.Wolverine12 I've been going through Wolverine and the X-Men since I don't really remember much from it. I have five episodes left but, despite having a lot of bad episodes (mainly when they go off of the main Days of Futures Past/Dark Phoenix Saga/Age of Apocalypse story) it's a pretty damn solid show and is, at least compared to the 1990's cartoon, a much more faithful and really took a lot of the comic stories (SENTINEL!) without actually adapting them. I feel like if Marvel Studios had X-Men this is what it would be. Anyway, I figured since your the X-Guy I was wondering how you felt about the series as a whole. I remember you saying you really liked it but never really went further than that. I did really enjoy the show quite a lot. I liked the animation and I actually enjoyed the DoFP story line eventually. Marrow could be really annoying but her relationship with the sentinel was kind of endearing. I thought the animation was great as well as the voice acting. They fit in a lot of classic X-Men/Wolverine tales into one season with out the series seeming to be stretched too thin which was pretty impressive. I am super bummed they never made more because from what I understand it was really popular but the first season ended around the time Disney bought Marvel so I guess they decided to go in a new overall crappy direction with their animated division. Marrow and Rover's relationship was straight out of the comic Sentinel. Rover was even named that in the comic but Marrow wasn't involved. I finished it today and I agree, super bummed out about no season two. At least now we have three awesome cartoons now.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 28, 2014 23:57:46 GMT -6
I did really enjoy the show quite a lot. I liked the animation and I actually enjoyed the DoFP story line eventually. Marrow could be really annoying but her relationship with the sentinel was kind of endearing. I thought the animation was great as well as the voice acting. They fit in a lot of classic X-Men/Wolverine tales into one season with out the series seeming to be stretched too thin which was pretty impressive. I am super bummed they never made more because from what I understand it was really popular but the first season ended around the time Disney bought Marvel so I guess they decided to go in a new overall crappy direction with their animated division. Marrow and Rover's relationship was straight out of the comic Sentinel. Rover was even named that in the comic but Marrow wasn't involved. I finished it today and I agree, super bummed out about no season two. At least now we have three awesome cartoons now.[/quote] Yeah I know that the Marrow/Sentinel was from a comic, oddly enough though I thought it was from Morrison's New X-Men which I'm sure just referenced the "Sentinel" comic you are talking about. You say we have 3 awesome cartoons now but what 3 are you talking about? I thought you hated Ultimate Spiderman as much as I do. Avengers Assemble is okay but I definitely like Avengers: EMH a lot more. As for the 3rd show (Hulk and agents of SMASH) I never bothered with that one because it did not look like something I would enjoy. Maybe Guardians will be better. I've noticed that I definitely prefer the Marvel animated shows/movies that are targeted for older kids/young adults. Ult. Spidey and Avengers Assemble are clearly meant for young kids and I can understand why Marvel would do that but I just don't find them enjoyable to watch. Another plus for WaTXM was it was set in the same universe as Hulk Vs. which is Marvels best animated feature to date imho.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 29, 2014 9:25:21 GMT -6
Some thoughts on Bagley's The End #1 cover. • Black Cat is leading the Ultimate team? Go Black Cat! • But why is Reed Richards trying to grab Cloak? Or is he trying to feel up Tony Stark's steel-enforced thigh? I can't quite make it out. But those are some crazy looking eyes on Reed. • I personally don't like the cover. I'm really not a fan of the art. Bagley's just not as good as he used to be, and I don't think he ever will be again. Wolverine12 I've been going through Wolverine and the X-Men since I don't really remember much from it. I have five episodes left but, despite having a lot of bad episodes (mainly when they go off of the main Days of Futures Past/Dark Phoenix Saga/Age of Apocalypse story) it's a pretty damn solid show and is, at least compared to the 1990's cartoon, a much more faithful and really took a lot of the comic stories (SENTINEL!) without actually adapting them. I feel like if Marvel Studios had X-Men this is what it would be. Anyway, I figured since your the X-Guy I was wondering how you felt about the series as a whole. I remember you saying you really liked it but never really went further than that. I hope you don't mind me offering my thoughts on the series. Sorry. I was bored. I thought the series was excellent (despite the fact that Wolverine was rarely allowed to actually shank anyone). I think it's one of the best superhero shows of the past decade. Unfortunately though, the pretentious censorship ruined the experience a little bit for me. I loved how accurately Wolverine was characterised, I was very impressed with that, and I also really enjoyed how accurately depicted all the other characters in the show were. But this was definitely a softer, more shank-free Logan. He's the best at what he does, but we couldn't actually see him at his best. But TBF, television creators don't usually get to decide on their Network's policies, so it's not their fault that Wolverine couldn't stab the f*** out of some goons. So Fox marketing the series as Wolverine and the X-Men was a bit dumb creatively speaking considering a proper, definitive Wolverine is certainly not going to be accepted for children's television. The Network (Fox) should have either marketed it at a more mature audience, or altered their policies accordingly, if they wanted to make a proper Wolverine animated series. But other than that I thought everything else from the writing, animation and dubs were all good, they were all high quality. It's a really good cartoon. And I agree Wyo, the DoFP and Phoenix story arcs were my favourites too. I thought the series was better than Avengers: EMH. Most of all I loved seeing the vast amount of characters and all their accurately portrayed personas. It's without a doubt a terrific kids adaption of the X-Men mythos. I think WatXM is an excellent X-Men animated series, but due to the age-rating, I think it missed out at being an essential Wolverine animated series. But it gets a 5/5 from me nonetheless.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 29, 2014 10:31:36 GMT -6
Yeah I know that the Marrow/Sentinel was from a comic, oddly enough though I thought it was from Morrison's New X-Men which I'm sure just referenced the "Sentinel" comic you are talking about. You say we have 3 awesome cartoons now but what 3 are you talking about? I thought you hated Ultimate Spiderman as much as I do. Avengers Assemble is okay but I definitely like Avengers: EMH a lot more. As for the 3rd show (Hulk and agents of SMASH) I never bothered with that one because it did not look like something I would enjoy. Maybe Guardians will be better. I've noticed that I definitely prefer the Marvel animated shows/movies that are targeted for older kids/young adults. Ult. Spidey and Avengers Assemble are clearly meant for young kids and I can understand why Marvel would do that but I just don't find them enjoyable to watch. Another plus for WaTXM was it was set in the same universe as Hulk Vs. which is Marvels best animated feature to date imho. It's bee a long time since I've read Morrison's stuff. I know WatXM took stuff (the costumes especially) from that and Astonishing X-Men. Try out season three of USM, season two of Avengers Assemble (MASSIVE improvement here), and season two of HatAoSMASH. There's still the occasional meh episode but they've improved a lot. I've loved all three since the start though. TheDarman is the one that hates it. Wolverine12 I've been going through Wolverine and the X-Men since I don't really remember much from it. I have five episodes left but, despite having a lot of bad episodes (mainly when they go off of the main Days of Futures Past/Dark Phoenix Saga/Age of Apocalypse story) it's a pretty damn solid show and is, at least compared to the 1990's cartoon, a much more faithful and really took a lot of the comic stories (SENTINEL!) without actually adapting them. I feel like if Marvel Studios had X-Men this is what it would be. Anyway, I figured since your the X-Guy I was wondering how you felt about the series as a whole. I remember you saying you really liked it but never really went further than that. I hope you don't mind me offering my thoughts on the series. Sorry. I was bored. I thought the series was excellent (despite the fact that Wolverine was rarely allowed to actually shank anyone). I think it's one of the best superhero shows of the past decade. Unfortunately though, the pretentious censorship ruined the experience a little bit for me. I loved how accurately Wolverine was characterised, I was very impressed with that, and I also really enjoyed how accurately depicted all the other characters in the show were. But this was definitely a softer, more shank-free Logan. He's the best at what he does, but we couldn't actually see him at his best. But TBF, television creators don't usually get to decide on their Network's policies, so it's not their fault that Wolverine couldn't stab the f*** out of some goons. So Fox marketing the series as Wolverine and the X-Men was a bit dumb creatively speaking considering a proper, definitive Wolverine is certainly not going to be accepted for children's television. The Network (Fox) should have either marketed it at a more mature audience, or altered their policies accordingly, if they wanted to make a proper Wolverine animated series. But other than that I thought everything else from the writing, animation and dubs were all good, they were all high quality. It's a really good cartoon. And I agree Wyo, the DoFP and Phoenix story arcs were my favourites too. I thought the series was better than Avengers: EMH. Most of all I loved seeing the vast amount of characters and all their accurately portrayed personas. It's without a doubt a terrific kids adaption of the X-Men mythos. I think WatXM is an excellent X-Men animated series, but due to the age-rating, I think it missed out at being an essential Wolverine animated series. But it gets a 5/5 from me nonetheless. Eh, I think they did the the whole "no stabbing" thing very well. I never really think about it during the show and when I did it was only to distract from the occasional bad writing that would pop up here and there.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 29, 2014 12:37:38 GMT -6
Eh, I think they did the the whole "no stabbing" thing very well. I never really think about it during the show and when I did it was only to distract from the occasional bad writing that would pop up here and there. I think it did everything really well. It's just we weren't allowed a full throttle Wolverine. That's not the creators fault. I think it's quite a decent Wolverine story. But as an X-Men story, it's absolutely fantastic. Or should I say, Uncanny? I can't fault it. I enjoyed pretty much every episode.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 30, 2014 11:39:44 GMT -6
Marvel released another teaser, a fairly exciting one. Now I had no issue with the events of OMD, but I am all for whatever this might be.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 30, 2014 14:17:17 GMT -6
May 6th, 2016 - Captain America: Civil War No Sentinel of Liberty. Wasn't expecting that. This obviously can't be the Civil War we know from the comics. MCU America doesn't have anywhere near enough characters for that to work. Marvel need more than just one team and a few solo characters on the side. I know they have GotG, but why would they be concerned about a government registration act? What's more is that about 90% of all the MCU superheroes already work for the government. Marvel need more earth-bound heroes, including more teams and a lot more street-level heroes, if they want Civil War to work. If Disney can rekindle their ability to create wonderful live-action family entertainment, this could very well be the movie of the year. I'm thinking the glorious magic and wonder of something like The Pagemaster mixed with a stark contrast of dark and spooky demonic imagery. I imagine swirls of colour, haunting spirits and lots of trickery with shadows and light. Hopefully it will adhere strongly to the hallucinogenic drug crowd like Life of Pi and Avatar did with they're magnificent display of colour. This film could be something wonderful if the production team strive for something a little more unique in their visuals. It has to be beautiful. Throw in some light humour and a likeable actor for the role and I'd say it's on to a winner. I am not familiar with the Director, but it's comforting to hear he's adept with horror movies. Dr Strange is Earth's most beneficial ally against the demonic realms after all, so who knows what crazy shit we could see. This is going to be epic. Why won't they wait until Hemmingsworth is older? We've already had two fresh faced Thor movies. Now we need to see a Thor that's grittier, crustier and more battle-hardened. Give us a 40 year old-ish looking Thor/Hemmingsworth with greasier hair, and a short rough beard. A Viking of battle, in contrast to the Prince of royalty we've already seen plenty of. We should want our characters to develop further, to keep getting better. I don't see why Marvel want to churn this trilogy out so quickly. Awesome. Why have they changed her name? Sweet. I really like that Marvel are going to do a two-part Avengers movie. So there's lots of room to fill it with lots of story (and lots of action). I want to see Hulk be manipulated in some way. Might even lead into WWH or Planet Hulk. Remember, you heard it here first.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 30, 2014 14:27:25 GMT -6
May 6th, 2016 - Captain America: Civil War No Sentinel of Liberty. Wasn't expecting that. This obviously can't be the Civil War we know from the comics. MCU America doesn't have anywhere near enough characters for that to work. Marvel need more than just one team and a few solo characters on the side. I know they have GotG, but why would they be concerned about a government registration act? What's more is that about 90% of all the MCU superheroes already work for the government. Marvel need more earth-bound heroes, including more teams and a lot more street-level heroes, if they want Civil War to work. This will be after at least Daredevil so the street-level corner will be filled out. They'll have a TON of characters by then. Why have they changed her name? That's what she's called now. Reasoning is given in issue #1
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 30, 2014 17:30:04 GMT -6
I saw someone else post this and I want this, too.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 30, 2014 18:51:35 GMT -6
She's already in Captain America: The First Avenger. And not a quick flash like Mrs. Quill
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 30, 2014 19:53:18 GMT -6
She's already in Captain America: The First Avenger. And not a quick flash like Mrs. Quill I do not care. I will accept a retcon of that actress being used already.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 30, 2014 21:53:03 GMT -6
She's already in Captain America: The First Avenger. And not a quick flash like Mrs. Quill Carol Danvers was in The First Avenger? When?
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 30, 2014 22:40:55 GMT -6
She's already in Captain America: The First Avenger. And not a quick flash like Mrs. Quill Carol Danvers was in The First Avenger? When? Natalie Dormer was lol
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 31, 2014 15:56:33 GMT -6
Happy Halloween, everyone!
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Nov 1, 2014 17:17:02 GMT -6
This will be after at least Daredevil so the street-level corner will be filled out. They'll have a TON of characters by then. Daredevil is the only example you're using for the much needed Civil War roster of characters? Is there anyone else you think might be used to fill out the street-level corner of the MCU? They might throw in Luke Cage, and maybe even a few more characters too like Iron Fist, but that will hardly make any difference to the amount of characters needed, and along with such little screen time to dedicate to their development (remember, this is just one movie). It's going to take more than just the Avengers and a few street-level characters thrown in to make Civil War work. Daredevil and a couple other new characters are not enough for some or even all of the Avengers members to fight. And the movie Avengers are not a big enough team to be split into two teams. Hulk and Thor probably won't even be in it. And adding Daredevil - and maybe even a couple more new characters like Luke Cage - isn't going to make much difference to that. Where are you getting "tonne of characters" from, what makes you say that? With the limited characters they have to work with, it essentially can't be much more than just some of the Avengers having a scrap with each other with a couple extra characters thrown in. You know that's not enough for Civil War to work, or at least not at all like the comic book version of the story. Of course the movie adaption will most probably try to be it's own thing, as it will have to be with such a limited amount of characters. But what makes you think the character roster will be more than the Avengers and couple solo characters on the side? It's not like they have any other teams, except for GotG which of course would not be concerned with a government registration act that takes place in a single country on a planet half way across the galaxy from them. The only earth-bound characters are the Avengers (some of which won't be in the movie), Daredevil and that's all there is. There's no Alpha Flight, Defenders or Illuminati. No X-Men, Fantastic Four or West Coast. It's just some of the Avengers with perhaps a few new characters thrown in. That's a lame Civil War concept and you know it. It's too soon. They should build up the heroes of MCU America before forcing a Civil War so early. It's detrimental to rush this concept which needs to have such epic scope and diversity in order to work at all. I can't remember either. Was it a funny/comedy scene?
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Nov 2, 2014 11:13:20 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Nov 2, 2014 13:57:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Nov 2, 2014 15:01:45 GMT -6
Sorry, I thought you were asking what scene Natalie Dormer was in.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Nov 2, 2014 16:09:45 GMT -6
Does anybody know why Iron Man 4 isn't in the Phase 3 line-up? Sorry, I thought you were asking what scene Natalie Dormer was in. No it wasn't that. I think I might've misunderstood.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Nov 3, 2014 16:48:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Nov 4, 2014 0:58:59 GMT -6
Happy Halloween, everyone! Did it get really annoying when the main character of your video was limping like that? I was super annoyed just watching a play through lol. I am interested in this, if you find updates please post them
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Nov 4, 2014 1:59:16 GMT -6
I haven't read the mangas yet so I should probably read those first. It looks like it'll be quite fun. I don't see it being a very big arc though. I don't think it will take long before the Marvel heroes wipe them out with all their flyers and blasters.
|
|
|
Post by Sage6Paths on Nov 4, 2014 13:21:34 GMT -6
Wow I have been gone for some time but this is crazy. I'm not mad but it just seems odd. Still I look forward to it.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Nov 4, 2014 14:17:17 GMT -6
Iron Man 4 UPDATE - It's not happening... yet.First Robert Downey Jr says he really wants to do Iron Man 4 and 5, but then a year later says he might very well be leaving after Avengers 2 (mega famous actors do this all the time to movie studios to raise their contract wages; think Brad Pitt, Will Smith and Toby Maguire). Then, his contract inevitably extends. Then last month, it was officially confirmed that he will be doing Iron Man 4. But then Marvel released their Phase 3 line up a couple weeks later and Iron Man 4 wasn't there. This makes me question: Why isn't Iron Man 4 in the Phase 3 line up? And are they going to push for a big Iron Man franchise rejuvenation in Phase 4? Perhaps there are aspects of the franchise that are being negotiated that we don't know about yet. Or less likely, we haven't seen all of Phase 3 revealed yet. Here's Downey's confirmation of Iron Man 4. www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=123768And now here is Downey saying the very antithesis of that. www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=123781It's not that bad. We've got lots of movies in Phase 3 as it is. And this just gives Marvel the opportunity to really think and make a really good Iron Man 4 for Phase 4.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Nov 4, 2014 18:53:55 GMT -6
Happy Halloween, everyone! Did it get really annoying when the main character of your video was limping like that? I was super annoyed just watching a play through lol. I am interested in this, if you find updates please post them Yeah, just a bit lol.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Nov 4, 2014 21:53:50 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Nov 5, 2014 9:12:39 GMT -6
Has anyone here seen Interstellar? Was it good?
|
|
|
Post by jer on Nov 5, 2014 18:12:01 GMT -6
Hey Peeps!
|
|