|
Post by wyokid on Oct 19, 2014 21:18:31 GMT -6
Just finished reading AXIS #1. I really the old school Avengers feel to the beginning (and sort of there at the end). Anybody else pick this up?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 20, 2014 0:19:07 GMT -6
I'm pretty mad at you guys, Wolverine dies and nobody bothers to ask me how I'm feeling... Except for that PM you ignored I replied and it didn't ask me how I felt, it asked me what I thought lol
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 20, 2014 0:20:26 GMT -6
Just finished reading AXIS #1. I really the old school Avengers feel to the beginning (and sort of there at the end). Anybody else pick this up? Yeah I got it, Magneto is a freaking bad ass!
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 20, 2014 2:25:15 GMT -6
Except for that PM you ignored I replied and it didn't ask me how I felt, it asked me what I thought lol How do you feel?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 20, 2014 3:06:45 GMT -6
I replied and it didn't ask me how I felt, it asked me what I thought lol How do you feel? I feel sad.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 20, 2014 6:33:13 GMT -6
It's ok my friend. He'll be back. He's just taking a break at the moment. Let him rest.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 20, 2014 11:03:26 GMT -6
Except for that PM you ignored I replied and it didn't ask me how I felt, it asked me what I thought lol Semantics lol. Just finished reading AXIS #1. I really the old school Avengers feel to the beginning (and sort of there at the end). Anybody else pick this up? Yeah I got it, Magneto is a freaking bad ass! I really dig what Bunn has been doing with him. I hope at the end of all this he's a full blown villain again.
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 20, 2014 13:40:42 GMT -6
It's ok my friend. He'll be back. He's just taking a break at the moment. Let him rest. Thanks buddy I replied and it didn't ask me how I felt, it asked me what I thought lol Semantics lol. Yeah I got it, Magneto is a freaking bad ass! I really dig what Bunn has been doing with him. I hope at the end of all this he's a full blown villain again. Yeah he has not been a "good guy" in that series but he has been kicking butt. He's been straddling the villain line but I'd say he is definitely and anti-hero at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 21, 2014 18:49:11 GMT -6
Is it just me or does Gotham feel like it is building to the Tim Burton universe? It's so delightfully goofy.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 21, 2014 20:22:50 GMT -6
Is it just me or does Gotham feel like it is building to the Tim Burton universe? It's so delightfully goofy. I somehow am not seeing the goofy side other people keep talking about.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 22, 2014 19:07:19 GMT -6
I don't know about anyone else, but that Age of Ultron trailer did absolutely nothing for me. It could be due to me still being in a "Avengers was just a fluke" mindset. I want to be excited, but yeah, pretty meh as far as I'm concerned. I feel like I'm sailing alone, but anybody else?
|
|
|
Post by Wolverine12 on Oct 22, 2014 21:32:41 GMT -6
I don't know about anyone else, but that Age of Ultron trailer did absolutely nothing for me. It could be due to me still being in a "Avengers was just a fluke" mindset. I want to be excited, but yeah, pretty meh as far as I'm concerned. I feel like I'm sailing alone, but anybody else? No you're not alone, I wasn't super impressed with it either. The fodder Ultrons look like knock off Sentinels from X-Men:DoFP and I have high expectations for Quicksilver now but I don't think they will be met in this movie. It is just a teaser trailer and of course I'm going to see it but the first trailer for DoFP got me insanely pumped for that movie, this not so much. I put that trailer below in case anyone else wants to watch them back to back like me
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 22, 2014 22:19:22 GMT -6
I'm always optimistic.
|
|
|
Post by Sage6Paths on Oct 23, 2014 4:41:33 GMT -6
Me too but that trailer was too boring... I guess? I don't know how to explain it but I am always optimistic for a Whedon film it's just that I am getting tired of the same overused Superhero plot. On another note has anyone else watch the 4th episode of Star Wars Rebels "Rise of the Old Masters"? It was perfect. I really can't wait to see more of the Inquisitor. How does he connect with Vader and the Emperor.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 23, 2014 10:22:33 GMT -6
Why is Magneto development always so exciting?! I always love a somewhat morally understandable villain. It's why I like TWD and Breaking Bad and I like the direction Magneto is headed, back to his best. But I'm not sure if it would make a lot of sense for Magneto to now go straight back to how he was after all he has experienced and learnt and taught others. It can't be a rushed afterthought. Character development must never lose it's intimacy with the reader. Marvel could always do something contrived and give him amnesia to explain the paradigm, but that would of course be a massive cop-out used simply to erase all the development he's been through since he joined the heroes. But I am strongly in favour of him going back to being a "bad guy", or an anti-villain. It's cool to see a villain like Magneto turn soft, but I'm certain most of us don't want him to stay that way. Now's the time for him to unleash all the frustration he's pent up. I imagine Magneto will soon go from being an anti-hero to an anti-villain, an enemy to a vast amount of both heroes and villains. A killer of villains and heroes, re-establishing him as the true anti-villain of the Marvel Universe, because many fans so often describe his traditional depiction as an anti-villain rather than a full-blown villain. I think if Marvel can re-establish this anti-villain phase, whilst incorporating the learning development he's been through recently, they'll have something very cool to work with. I agree, it's time for him to break bad again. It's time for him to get his murderous mojo back. I'll admit that I thought the decision to make him good was an odd choice, and I think bringing him back to badness is the wisest move, re-establishing him as the ultimate anti-villain of Marvel Comics. And he might even turn out worse than he was before. Walter White him so-to-speak if you get what I mean. I don't know about anyone else, but that Age of Ultron trailer did absolutely nothing for me. It could be due to me still being in a "Avengers was just a fluke" mindset. I want to be excited, but yeah, pretty meh as far as I'm concerned. I feel like I'm sailing alone, but anybody else? I think it looks badass. I think it will be much better than the first one, if this trailer is anything to go by. The fanboy in me is going berserk! For one thing - though it's obviously way too soon to know for sure - I think it looks more comfortable and more confident than the first movie. I'm 100% certain that it will deliver on what The Avengers was already awesome at doing; breathtaking cinematography, and also, the acting looks infinitely more competent, even though, it IS early days. About the cast: I'm hopeful. It's true that that I thought Scarlet Johansen and Chris Evens were seriously awful at times during the first Avengers movie, however, I personally noticed them be much more confident and more believable with their roles in Cap 2. It looks to me like they have a greater understanding of their character roles now, they all want to do their roles justice and everything seems to be coming together nicely for the franchise, and this makes me very confident that the film will be much tighter than the first. I always want the Marvel movies to be good. I really do. Even the visuals (IMO) look more impressive and definitely more expertly shot IMO. So yeah, I think the trailer is very promising indeed. So far, I think it looks ****ing amazing. I know it's too soon to know anything, but that's the impression I got. I can't wait. We'll be getting that Iron Man vs Hulk fight Marvel have been teasing since 2007! Ultron looks sick as ****. Even though we only got snippets of footage, I love the way everything is shot in those brief snippets, as well as little things like the expressions, demeanour and reactions of the character faces looking how I want to see them. Yes, it's only a trailer, but I think it looks promising so far. Plus, Samuel Jackson Fury looks so freaking cool with a blue beanie and Chris Evens should portray a very good Captain America performance now (especially if the script does Cap justice this time around). I just think the movie Avengers have come a long way. The cast seem to me to be more confident and intuitive with their roles. * We'll see. Scarlet Johansen might still be awful at portraying complex emotions, but she can be quite good if she's not asked to convey too much fear or strength. I do think she's overrated as an actress, but she can be good if the role doesn't demand too much. But that's just my opinion. Me too but that trailer was too boring... I guess? I don't know how to explain it but I am always optimistic for a Whedon film it's just that I am getting tired of the same overused Superhero plot. You make a good point. But superhero movies aren't the sort of movies that are hailed for their plot. All but one or two have very simple premises, and you're certainly not going to get any story with a trailer. I haven't started watching them yet but I will. I still need to watch all of AoT. And I'm always busy. But yeah I need to watch them soon.
|
|
|
Post by Spiderx3000 on Oct 23, 2014 15:04:46 GMT -6
I don't know about anyone else, but that Age of Ultron trailer did absolutely nothing for me. It could be due to me still being in a "Avengers was just a fluke" mindset. I want to be excited, but yeah, pretty meh as far as I'm concerned. I feel like I'm sailing alone, but anybody else? I completely agree. It was only an okay trailer, with nothing which excited me.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 24, 2014 2:34:17 GMT -6
Me too but that trailer was too boring... I guess? I don't know how to explain it but I am always optimistic for a Whedon film it's just that I am getting tired of the same overused Superhero plot. On another note has anyone else watch the 4th episode of Star Wars Rebels "Rise of the Old Masters"? It was perfect. I really can't wait to see more of the Inquisitor. How does he connect with Vader and the Emperor. Huh, I was freaking out like a school girl.
|
|
|
Post by Sage6Paths on Oct 24, 2014 7:29:40 GMT -6
Oh. Here we go again. How many times have we been through this? You know I never really outright said it but I'm going to say it right now. I hate you Bendis. Ha. No not really. I actually don't care at all.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 24, 2014 7:35:51 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 24, 2014 8:53:45 GMT -6
Oh. Here we go again. How many times have we been through this? You know I never really outright said it but I'm going to say it right now. I hate you Bendis. Ha. No not really. I actually don't care at all. So this is why Marvel gave their mainstream universe a Mahr-Vehl looking Iron Man, a Miles Morales, a Black Fury, a cool Thor, a "left-wing" Cap and a morally ambiguous Reed Richards. This is why people are losing faith in Marvel Comics and it's why they're making the jump to more independent projects.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 24, 2014 8:58:03 GMT -6
Huh, I was freaking out like a school girl. Me too. That Iron Man vs Hulk footage is just... orgasmic!
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 25, 2014 8:45:31 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by thedarman on Oct 25, 2014 12:17:08 GMT -6
So...with the rumor that Sony might reboot the Spider-Man franchise with Sinister Six to make room for Spider-Man to come into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, if it is true, who would you like to see play Peter Parker?
I actually thought Josh Hutcherson would be a pretty great choice to play Peter:
<img src="http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120205000914/joshhutcherson/images/b/bf/Josh_Hutcherson.jpg" alt=""><br><br>He's 5'7", finally providing a short Spider-Man. He would be the youngest guy to play Spider-Man, at age 25 at the time of the Sinister Six film's release. Obviously, we'd probably have him back in high school, which might seem a little tiresome but I think Spider-Man has always worked better as a young guy. With Marvel's supposed plan to kick off Civil War with Captain America 3, to bring in a Spider-Man solo film in 2018 that would tie in with the event would make a good deal of sense. And, launching a new universe, should Sony opt to, with Sinister Six would establish Spider-Man's universe and avoid retelling the origin again. Yet again, Sony would probably like to avoid destroying all the world-building they did in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. However, I think for Spider-Man to work in the MCU now, they'd either need to do quite a bit of continuity explaining or reboot.
Either way, I just thought the recent rumors, coupled with the fact that Joe and Anthony Russo were talking about Captain America 3 asking if the character "even has to be at Marvel" to appear in the film and the Civil War rumors, it would make for a pretty decent theory. What about you guys?
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 25, 2014 13:14:05 GMT -6
Constantine was so good last night. Also I felt like I was back in Assassin's Creed IV.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 25, 2014 22:51:24 GMT -6
So...with the rumor that Sony might reboot the Spider-Man franchise with Sinister Six to make room for Spider-Man to come into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, if it is true, who would you like to see play Peter Parker? I actually thought Josh Hutcherson would be a pretty great choice to play Peter: <img src="http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120205000914/joshhutcherson/images/b/bf/Josh_Hutcherson.jpg" alt=""><br><br>He's 5'7", finally providing a short Spider-Man. He would be the youngest guy to play Spider-Man, at age 25 at the time of the Sinister Six film's release. Obviously, we'd probably have him back in high school, which might seem a little tiresome but I think Spider-Man has always worked better as a young guy. With Marvel's supposed plan to kick off Civil War with Captain America 3, to bring in a Spider-Man solo film in 2018 that would tie in with the event would make a good deal of sense. And, launching a new universe, should Sony opt to, with Sinister Six would establish Spider-Man's universe and avoid retelling the origin again. Yet again, Sony would probably like to avoid destroying all the world-building they did in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. However, I think for Spider-Man to work in the MCU now, they'd either need to do quite a bit of continuity explaining or reboot. Either way, I just thought the recent rumors, coupled with the fact that Joe and Anthony Russo were talking about Captain America 3 asking if the character "even has to be at Marvel" to appear in the film and the Civil War rumors, it would make for a pretty decent theory. What about you guys? My buddy thinks Marvel has already bought Spider-Man back and Sinister Six is just in the deal. Personally I want Drake Bell. He's in the age range, he played a believable Spider-Man ripoff in Superhero Movie (not a good movie, but he was good), and he's absolutely perfect in Ultimate Spider-Man. That or Danny Glover.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_Monster_Munch on Oct 26, 2014 3:58:59 GMT -6
So...with the rumor that Sony might reboot the Spider-Man franchise with Sinister Six to make room for Spider-Man to come into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, if it is true, who would you like to see play Peter Parker? I actually thought Josh Hutcherson would be a pretty great choice to play Peter: <img src="http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120205000914/joshhutcherson/images/b/bf/Josh_Hutcherson.jpg" alt=""><br><br>He's 5'7", finally providing a short Spider-Man. He would be the youngest guy to play Spider-Man, at age 25 at the time of the Sinister Six film's release. Obviously, we'd probably have him back in high school, which might seem a little tiresome but I think Spider-Man has always worked better as a young guy. With Marvel's supposed plan to kick off Civil War with Captain America 3, to bring in a Spider-Man solo film in 2018 that would tie in with the event would make a good deal of sense. And, launching a new universe, should Sony opt to, with Sinister Six would establish Spider-Man's universe and avoid retelling the origin again. Yet again, Sony would probably like to avoid destroying all the world-building they did in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. However, I think for Spider-Man to work in the MCU now, they'd either need to do quite a bit of continuity explaining or reboot. Either way, I just thought the recent rumors, coupled with the fact that Joe and Anthony Russo were talking about Captain America 3 asking if the character "even has to be at Marvel" to appear in the film and the Civil War rumors, it would make for a pretty decent theory. What about you guys? I don't think much continuity would need to be explained for Spider-Man to be in the MCU, or really any explanation at all. I think it could be as simple as the Avengers fighting - let's say the Dark Elves of Svartalfar because I think they're cool - and just have Spider-Man show up to help them fight the gigantic onslaught. I think it's just about who owns what property. Company licensing agreements is something I am not completely educated on so I could be wrong - and I hope I am - but I don't see Sony giving up their Spider-Man movie rights. That said, I wouldn't be surprised if Marvel were already saving their pennies to buy back Spider-Man. I suppose it's up to Sony. I wonder what their asking price will be. I'm not keen on Marvel pushing for a Civil War movie so soon. There are too many teams, characters and whatnot needed to fill the opposing forces. Marvel's cinematic Earth is greatly lacking the amount of heroes needed to make Civil War work. I think Marvel need to get their Avengers Anthology out of the way first, before attempting to achieve such an epic superhero scale. I'm also not keen on another Spider-Man reboot. Just how many different Goblins do we need? But that's just my opinion. Edit - I don't personally know of any celebrities that would be a right fit for Peter Parker. But I think I would make a good PP. But I haven't got Marvel's phone number and I can't afford plane tickets to the US. I can do a very convincing American accent though, and my jokes can be really cheeky and upbeat.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 26, 2014 7:06:13 GMT -6
So...with the rumor that Sony might reboot the Spider-Man franchise with Sinister Six to make room for Spider-Man to come into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, if it is true, who would you like to see play Peter Parker? I actually thought Josh Hutcherson would be a pretty great choice to play Peter: <img src="http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120205000914/joshhutcherson/images/b/bf/Josh_Hutcherson.jpg" alt=""><br><br>He's 5'7", finally providing a short Spider-Man. He would be the youngest guy to play Spider-Man, at age 25 at the time of the Sinister Six film's release. Obviously, we'd probably have him back in high school, which might seem a little tiresome but I think Spider-Man has always worked better as a young guy. With Marvel's supposed plan to kick off Civil War with Captain America 3, to bring in a Spider-Man solo film in 2018 that would tie in with the event would make a good deal of sense. And, launching a new universe, should Sony opt to, with Sinister Six would establish Spider-Man's universe and avoid retelling the origin again. Yet again, Sony would probably like to avoid destroying all the world-building they did in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. However, I think for Spider-Man to work in the MCU now, they'd either need to do quite a bit of continuity explaining or reboot. Either way, I just thought the recent rumors, coupled with the fact that Joe and Anthony Russo were talking about Captain America 3 asking if the character "even has to be at Marvel" to appear in the film and the Civil War rumors, it would make for a pretty decent theory. What about you guys? My buddy thinks Marvel has already bought Spider-Man back and Sinister Six is just in the deal. Personally I want Drake Bell. He's in the age range, he played a believable Spider-Man ripoff in Superhero Movie (not a good movie, but he was good), and he's absolutely perfect in Ultimate Spider-Man. That or Danny Glover. I don't view that as a rip-off.
|
|
|
Post by wyokid on Oct 26, 2014 7:29:14 GMT -6
My buddy thinks Marvel has already bought Spider-Man back and Sinister Six is just in the deal. Personally I want Drake Bell. He's in the age range, he played a believable Spider-Man ripoff in Superhero Movie (not a good movie, but he was good), and he's absolutely perfect in Ultimate Spider-Man. That or Danny Glover. I don't view that as a rip-off. That's literally what it was though. That film was parodying Spider-Man.
|
|
|
Post by thecrimson on Oct 26, 2014 11:41:24 GMT -6
I don't view that as a rip-off. That's literally what it was though. That film was parodying Spider-Man. There you go. It was a parody.
|
|
|
Post by thedarman on Oct 26, 2014 11:47:32 GMT -6
So...with the rumor that Sony might reboot the Spider-Man franchise with Sinister Six to make room for Spider-Man to come into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, if it is true, who would you like to see play Peter Parker? I actually thought Josh Hutcherson would be a pretty great choice to play Peter: <img src="http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120205000914/joshhutcherson/images/b/bf/Josh_Hutcherson.jpg" alt=""><br><br>He's 5'7", finally providing a short Spider-Man. He would be the youngest guy to play Spider-Man, at age 25 at the time of the Sinister Six film's release. Obviously, we'd probably have him back in high school, which might seem a little tiresome but I think Spider-Man has always worked better as a young guy. With Marvel's supposed plan to kick off Civil War with Captain America 3, to bring in a Spider-Man solo film in 2018 that would tie in with the event would make a good deal of sense. And, launching a new universe, should Sony opt to, with Sinister Six would establish Spider-Man's universe and avoid retelling the origin again. Yet again, Sony would probably like to avoid destroying all the world-building they did in The Amazing Spider-Man 2. However, I think for Spider-Man to work in the MCU now, they'd either need to do quite a bit of continuity explaining or reboot. Either way, I just thought the recent rumors, coupled with the fact that Joe and Anthony Russo were talking about Captain America 3 asking if the character "even has to be at Marvel" to appear in the film and the Civil War rumors, it would make for a pretty decent theory. What about you guys? My buddy thinks Marvel has already bought Spider-Man back and Sinister Six is just in the deal. Personally I want Drake Bell. He's in the age range, he played a believable Spider-Man ripoff in Superhero Movie (not a good movie, but he was good), and he's absolutely perfect in Ultimate Spider-Man. That or Danny Glover. I don't know. I think Drake Bell has the same problem that Andrew Garfield currently has: where he's going to be too old to play Peter Parker within a span of five or six years. I think, given some great direction, Drake Bell could work out really well as Spider-Man, but, in the show, we don't really see too much Peter Parker. So, I don't really know how he'd pull that off. And voice acting is quite different from ACTING. I haven't seen the parody film so I can't really speak on that. I stand by decision but I could see Marvel maybe going for Drake Bell. Donald Glover also seems like a pretty popular choice so I wonder if they'd actually go through with that.
|
|