Ultimately Off-Topic

The first film used very little which is why it still looks incredibly.

I was always under the impression that it was a lot of animatronics. There was very little CGI when that movie came out and the effects would look a lot worse if they used them. 

This is correct. Look at how awful Godzilla (1998) looks now. That was completely CGI. Long tracking and far away dinosaurs were CGI but most of the stuff up close (the memorable stuff) was animatronics and puppets with CGI touch ups.

So? I'm still excited for their plans, because I don't think I can wait that long for certain villains to appear if a reboot happens (which it would if Marvel got the movie rights back).

I'm excited too, but I've unfortunately stopped expecting anything to be "good."  I still stand that the ASM2 had the best Spider-Man/Peter Parker content with excellent character interactions, and fantastic spidey sequences.  But the narrative is so broken, and the tone completely uneven.  Its heartbreaking to see a film fall apart in the editing room, because in every scene you can just tell everyone is giving it their all and loves it.  Hopefully they tighten up in the future.  

That's a lot of characters to address in a single movie. The narrative would be very difficult to put together, especially considering the inevitable villain that will show up at some point in the movie. See my reply to Agemoi on how difficult it will be to address all the character development.

Whom is a great actor whatever role he plays. But he was anything but a badass Batman.

Disregarding the dance off, I still don't see how Batman wouldn't be overlooked in comparison to how awesome Superman's abilities are. Batman needs to be physically badass too. He's probably going to be the main reason most fans will go to watch the movie.

There's also the final fight to consider. Batman can't just be the guy who comes up with the plan. The GA would not like that. He needs to be seen as physically helpful to Superman without Superman outshining him so prominently.

Yes, that would be the wisest approach to writing this movie. But I don't think it would be enough. Like when the main villain eventually surfaces, Batman's going to need to be more than just 'the man with the plan'. His physical portrayal will undoubtably be running alongside Superman's. With this happening, will it be possible for fans to come away from the movie thinking Batman is badass when Superman is flying around defeating a hundred times as many enemies as Batman in less than half the time?

Where the characters were fully established in their own titles before coming together for a team up (this won't be Nolan's Batman) and where Loki had already been established as a major threat in Thor. This is a monumental picture to pull off, and it would go much smoother if these characters were fully developed first before being clashed together. It's going to be difficult handling these two very different characters as well as the story development surrounding Snyder's MoS cast. I know most of those characters can go ignored, but is that really a wise decision following the set-up left at the end of MoS?

That's the thing. I don't want Batman to be super-powered. I don't want to see him destroy multiple Doomsdays in combat or see him having his kevlar mask remain intact after being hit my one of Super-Man incredible punches. I suspect even the film's trailer will fail to depict Batman accurately.

I still need to read this.

Thats his thing though haha hes supposed to be annoyed

which part? lol  I give credit where credits due, and i do dig it a lot for sure.  But i cant overlook its issues either.